Tag Archives: Politics

How They Spend Their Time

A long time ago I worked at a corporate cafeteria.  In addition to serving lunches to the folks that had an office in the building, we would also cater events; weddings, anniversaries and what not.  On top of that, we would cater corporate lunches and “moral boosters.”  You know, that lunch outside serving picnic food and a coke.  Or, maybe it’s just a free ice cream sundae one afternoon.  All good ideas.

As I worked these that one summer, I was struck by one thing.  These high paid professional people would wait in line, in the sun, for a long long time to get a hot dog or a scoop of ice cream.  I never have understood it.  And now that I’m that professional worker in that office building and have the opportunity to wait 40 minutes in line for some chocolate ice cream, I smile and just keep on keepin’ on.

This story in France reminded me of those days:

An angry crowd hurled missiles and tipped over a vehicle near the Eiffel Tower in Paris Saturday after a company promised a massive cash giveaway but then failed to deliver, police said.

Trouble flared among the crowd of around 7,000 people when they realised the Internet company Rentabiliweb were not going ahead with the publicity stunt to give away some 40,000 euros (60,000 dollars).

Much like the cube dwellers on the offices above, these people apparently value their time at about $2,50 an hour.  See, I’m guessing that the whole ordeal took about two hours,  and the most likely payout for these folks would be $5.  Again, to be clear, these people would rather just blow hours of their time fo $5 than actually DO something.  Now, to be fair, maybe I’m making too big a deal over nothing.  Maybe the idea of spending time in a park in front of the Eiffel Tower is time well spent and heck, 5 free dollars with the chance to earn more seems like a bonus.  I think it’s a sign of what happens when people have an entitlement attitude.  When they are used to being take care of.  When they forget that they have to earn what is theirs.  My proof in this theory?

Police arrested around 10 people and nine were remanded in custody as anger erupted in the shadow of the Paris landmark.

I am afraid that this is where WE are heading.

Tough to Call

The House of Representatives voted to pass their version of the Health Care bill.  The vote was close, 220-215.  Of the 220 “Yeah” votes, only one of them was from a Republican congressman; Joseph Cao from Louisiana.  Already Republicans are deserting him:

The only Republican in the House to vote for a Democrat-backed health care bill says he has had two fundraisers canceled since Saturday’s vote and some campaign contributors have asked for their money back.

I don’t agree with the Grand Old Party on this one; I think they have it wrong.  This is delicate situation for Joseph.  The only reason he has the seat is because the incumbent, William Jefferson, was caught with 80k in his freezer.  On top of that, the  election that resulted in Cao winning the seat was delayed twice due to hurricanes.  This meant that the star power of Obama wasn’t on the ballot; many many Democrats just stayed home.  And he still only barely won.

Look, the bill didn’t pass because of Joseph, a firm anti-abortion advocate, voted yes.  In fact, the bill may have passed because Republicans got their way–they insisted that strong anti-abortion language be inserted in the bill giving cover to the more conservative democrats who may come from pro-life districts.  In fact, Cao didn’t even cast his vote until AFTER the 218th vote had already been counted.

This is a case of a Republican trying to stay in office.  Hard to blame him.

Sleight of Hand

I have to admit I was suckered.  I bit.  Hook line and sinker.  DAMN it!  When I saw the headline I should have known:

Senate Dems Aim to Curb Fed’s Powers

But instead I clicked through.  And got suckered yet again:

WASHINGTON – Senate Democrats on Tuesday proposed stripping the Federal Reserve of its supervisory powers

WOW!  Virginia and New Jersey really got to these guys!

My excitement and wonderment lasted, ohh, about 14 words; and that’s counting “Washington”

and creating instead three new federal agencies to police banks, protect consumers and dismantle failing institutions.

Doh!  I should’ve known!  In fact, I’m pissed I missed it.  I mean, really?  A Democrat trying to reduce the size of government? Sheesh.

Hot Stove League

The Twins traded Carlos Gomez to the Brewers for J.J. Hardy on Friday.  The thinking in the Twins front office is that they were able to move out weak hitting center fielder and bring in a short stop that can hit for power and has a decent average.  Further, Hardy is a fantastic fielder bringing an elite defender to the Twins infield.

This is a good deal.

twins

The Democrats would have us believe the same is true of the trade they made this past Saturday.  What they have passed in the house is a trade of sorts.  The thinking in the minds of the Democrats is that we are able to get rid of a system that costs too much and leaves too many people uninsured.  By passing laws that prohibit insurance companies from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions they are able to bring in a system that allows for insurance to everyone.  Further, to help bring down costs to those most in need, the plan calls for all Americans to enroll in an approved policy or face a fine.

This is a good deal.

Back to baseball.  I began to look a little deeper into the trade and began to see a couple of things.  By moving Gomez out and brining in Hardy, not only did we trade away a .229 average for a player that hit .283 in 2008.  Further, Brady hit 24 HR to 3 for Gomez.  On top of that, with Gomez out of the lineup the Twins now have room for Delmon Young who has a career average of .290.  Not only are we trading for a player with 57 some odd points to the plus, we are also able to play Young for a full season.

This is turning into a REALLY good deal.

On top of the fact that insurance companies are no longer able to restrict insurance for people with pre-existing conditions the House bill doesn’t raise taxes for a majority of Americans.  Rather, people making $500,000 or more would see a 5.4% increase on their tax bill.  Further, those “Gold Plated” policies would see a tax hike; up to 40%.  But for the average middle class American, the tax bill remains the same.  On top of that, the bill includes language that allows families making up to 400% of the poverty level to receive federal assistance; albeit on a sliding scale.  Last, if you currently receive insurance from your employer, you can continue to do so.  Or, if you don’t, there will be a National Exchange.

This is turning into a REALLY good deal.

As I wrap up my trade analysis, I end up with the unintended consequences.  By trading away Carlos Gomez, the Twins center fielder, the team must now play Denard Span in CF.  And THAT means with Span in center, Delmon Young has to play in left field.  Now, when the Twins had Gomez in CF and Young in LF, they were able to brag the best OF in baseball.  But, with the unintended consequence of Span in center and Young in left, the Twins will now be  start the worst OF in baseball; to the tune of 88 runs to the bad.  That doesn’t even come close to the benefit they gain by adding Hardy to the team.

The unintended consequence of a horrible defense has made this trade:  BAD.

Sadly, the story is much the same for the Democrats and the House bill.  By allowing people to purchase insurance without regard for pre-existing conditions, people are not compelled to purchase insurance while they are healthy; they can be assured that they can buy it when they become sick.  But-but-but, they HAVE to buy a policy or they will pay a fine!  Well, the fine is very very much less than whatever policy I would otherwise buy:

The average cost of an insurance policy with family coverage in 2009 is $13,375. A married couple with a median family income of $75,000 who choose not to insure would be subject to a fine of 2.5 percent of that $75,000, or $1,875. So the family would save a net $11,500 by not insuring.

Hmm, the unintended consequences of horrible incentives has made this trade:  BAD.

results

A Breeze – Not Wind – of Change

This can’t be good news for Obama.

AT FIRST sight, the idea that Europe has anything to teach America about tackling unemployment seems preposterous. America has some of the most flexible labour markets in the developed world, while continental Europe, in the popular imagination, is a sclerotic place with powerful unions, rigid labour markets and high entrenched joblessness. Over the past quarter-century America’s unemployment rate has averaged 5.8%, compared with 9.5% in France and 9.1% in Germany.

This picture may be changing. Although output in the euro area has fallen as much as in America, the unemployment rolls have not grown as much. The euro-wide jobless rate is up by less than a third, compared with a doubling across the Atlantic. At 9.7%, euro-area unemployment is high, but slightly lower than in America, where new figures due on November 6th were expected to show joblessness hitting double digits.

Unemployment Comparison

Well, then again it might.  I am convinced that our President is out to build a more left leaning European socialist state than the right leaning socialist state that we have now.  So really, it’s hard to tell.  But what I mean, really mean, is that The Economist is actually calling him out on it!

The United States has put in place a hefty fiscal stimulus, but relatively little of that money has gone into labour-market policies—schemes to slow firing, boost hiring or support the jobless.

Europe’s policymakers, in contrast, appear to have a more coherent strategy: one which uses government money to subsidise a shortened work week, cuts labour costs and, in a few cases, offers tax subsidies to support new jobs. The OECD says 22 out of 29 of its member countries have extended support for workers on furlough, and 16 have cut payroll taxes and other social contributions

Now, before we get all “crazy talk” here, I wanna point out that shortened work weeks and paid furloughs are NOT my ideas of economic good ideas.  And as I was reading my edition of The Economist at my favorite Thai place, I just about lost my belly.  See, I mostly think that The Economist calls itself The Economist because they wanna trick conservatives into reading leftist views.  Almost as if…. But then, in a last second Hail Mary, The Economist pulls off the improbable:

Consider the subsidising of shorter work weeks, continental Europe’s most dramatic innovation. By in effect paying firms to hoard workers, governments have slowed the rise in joblessness and helped prop up consumer confidence and demand. In a vicious temporary slump, driven by a credit crunch and the collapse of global spending, such subsidies make short-term sense. But they prop up demand by fossilising a country’s job structure and preventing the shift of workers from industries with excess capacity (like carmaking) to more promising ones. That ossification will surely come to haunt continental Europe. And in an economy like America’s, where the end of the debt-fuelled consumer-spending binge is forcing big structural shifts, it would be insane.

And the revolution over at The Economist continues:

That is why Europe’s governments are right to focus on waiving or reducing their high payroll taxes, especially for additional hires. And it is why American proposals to finance an extension of unemployment insurance with payroll taxes are misguided. Heavy labour taxes are one reason why Europe entered the downturn with far higher unemployment than America. Lightening that burden would do most to boost jobs—on both sides of the Atlantic.

Thai tasted a whole lot better today.  And it was just some more bad news for Obama.

The Future is Now

This is what Obama thinks is better:

Raleigh, N.C. — Wake County officials have temporarily closed the county’s H1N1 vaccine clinics due to a depleted supply of the vaccine.

To be fair, Wake County is reporting:

“While the five Wake County H1N1 clinics that opened this morning have run out of vaccine, many physicians and pharmacies in our community do have vaccine available.” said Wake County Community Health Director Sue Lynn Ledford.

And here comes more news of tomorrow:

The closure started at 4 p.m. after the county distributed more than 6,000 doses of the vaccine at five clinics.

Karen North waited in line two hours to get her sons vaccinated at the Public Health Center, G-35, 10 Sunnybrook Road in Raleigh, on Monday.

Can you say Soviet bread lines?

Soviet Bread Line

Are they waiting for bread or medicine?

And the most chilling part?

“At this point, we are just trying to prioritize and get those patients who would benefit from it the most right now,” said Dr. Sharmell Wilson, of Growing Child Pediatrics.

You can ration by price or you can ration by fiat.

What Have We Become

Stumbled across a letter to Joe Lieberman tonight over at American Hatriotism today.  It’s awesome.  Basically you have someone over there talking about how awful, simply AWFUL, Mr. Lieberman is for coming out against the health care bill.  After a WHOLE bunch of discussion on the fact, we get to the point where a letter is penned and delivered to the Senator’s office.  I’ve captured all I could stand the beginning and then added my response to it.  If ya want, stop on over the Hatriotism and see if the comment got any action:

Dear Mr. Lieberman,

Do you sleep well while …..

so many Americans struggle to bear the pain and anguish they are experiencing today?

Far be it that people ought to struggle.

somewhere in America a hard working student finds out there is no means, no money, no way to college?

Is that hard-working student willing to work hard at a job?

a mother and father are struggling to provide the bare necessities for their disabled child?

Good bless then for being able to supply the necessities for their child; disabled or not.

an elderly man who fought for his country eats a can of beans for dinner and must dress in several layers of clothing because he can not afford a decent meal or to heat his meager home?

We thank him for his service; service to ensure that we are all free.  Free to be responsible.  Or not to be responsible.

a Mother over-medicates her baby with tylenol for his earache because she can not take him to the urgent care or doctor for treatment?

She should take the bay to urgent care or the doctor for treatment.

a family will huddle in the cold behind a dumpster to block the wind because they have nowhere else to go?

Before they go to the government, they should go to church.

a husband and wife lie in bed discussing how to break it to their children that they will soon lose their home and have to move?

The tender mercies of learning not to borrow money you can’t afford to pay back.

a couple that saved thousands for a home they will now lose when the bank takes it away?

This should be sent to Senator Frank actually.

a father tells his family he has lost his job and they can no longer count on him to take care of them?

A real father would say that he has lost his job and will do whatever it takes to take care of them.  Even if it means working 3 others.

a mother tells her children there isn’t anything left in the house to eat?

How many different ways can you say the same thing?

another father wonders how many more days, weeks, months before he will work again and worries how they’ll make it until then?

Jeez.

The whole rest of your letter is the same point on and on and on.

And the real tragedy?  Passing a law isn’t going to change any of that.

The Mind of a Leftist

Washington state has to play the “add-value” card, not “low-cost-leader” ace

That’s the headline from the Seattle Times this morning discussing why Puget Sound lost out on the Boeing factory to South Carolina.

We all look for value in the things that we buy.  Old Milwaukee is a cheaper beer than Long Hammer.  You can buy WAY more of it than you can that better beer for the money.  But, then again, Long Hammer is a better beer.  So, what do you buy?  Well, that depends.  On YOUR value proposition.  Almost every American I know enjoys this freedom, this Liberty.  The ability to tend to your individual tastes and take advantage of choices.  We do it with beer, with gas and even with eye glasses.

Why wouldn’t a corporation do the same?  In fact, value is one of the key considerations for corporations.  If they do NOT go after the best value, you could argue that they aren’t acting in the best interest of their shareholders.  Which makes this just laughable:

Boeing’s decision to establish a second 787 production line in South Carolina was a “race to the bottom” on pay punch to the solar plexus of the Puget Sound region.

Boeing didn’t decide to establish its second production line in South Carolina because of low pay.  They established their second production line in South Carolina because it offered more VALUE.  But Mr. Talson, contrary to his headline, hammers home the point of low pay:

After all, South Carolina’s new Boeing workers will make about $15 an hour compared with on average the $26 earned by veterans in the company’s Washington-state factories.

But wait, it gets even better.  As if lower pay isn’t enough, these Southern states offer such “amenities” as :

few unions and light environmental regulations

Further, those States have *gasp*

spent billions of dollars on incentives, such as cutting taxes and providing job training.

How dare those States create tax structures such that businesses can survive and even flourish.  And don’t even get me started on job training; down right repressive!

After these first few salvos, the tone of the article changes.  Mostly nonsense not having to do with why South Carolina won the line and Washington lost it.  But then comes this gem:

Washington workers are caught in the same downdraft that has been affecting Americans for at least 30 years: slowing growth of middle-class incomes, declining benefits and, through most of the 2000s, stagnant wages.

Ahh, huh?

When you ask the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank, they disagree:

non-monetary gains

Whatever.  Different topic for a different post.  However, its stunning what people can just write.  Because they want to.  Simply stunning.

Change You Can Believe In

A picture is worth a thousand words:

stimulus-vs-unemployment-october-dots

From Innocent Bystanders via TJIC

Freakin’ Obama.

I LIKE This Guy

I just finished a post about Minnesota Democrats being split on the health care bill.  Good for them.  Then I lamented the fact that they just be holding out for more “what’s in it for them.”  Shame on them.

Note to Minnesota Democrats; THIS is how ya git’er done!

WASHINGTON — North Carolina Rep. Mike McIntyre has announced that he will vote against a $1.2 trillion health-care bill in the House of Representatives, saying that reform needs to fiscally responsible and done in targeted steps.

Not only is McIntyre standing up for what is fiscally sound, but he is doing it at significant risk to his standing within the Democratic party:

President Barack Obama met with Democratic lawmakers in closed-door meetings Saturday to woo last-minute commitments.

I like the use of the word “woo.”

But even more than this, Rep. McIntyre actually articulates his reasons.  And these aren’t the normal crappy politician speak we normally hear from these folks:

  • The bill “costs way too much – more than $1 trillion dollars on top of a $12 trillion national debt.”
  • It doesn’t address long-term health costs.
  • It raises too many taxes and includes new requirements “that will harm the ability of too many small businesses to compete and create jobs.”
  • “It tries to do too much too soon, instead of targeted changes that can immediately help people.”

Republicans should grab this guy and thank him for the two gifts he has delivered:

  • Voting against this bill.
  • Publicizing the Conservative’s objections to this bill better than Conservatives.

Now all we have to do is work on Rep. Heath Shuler.