Without a doubt the United States has made mistakes in our dealings with a whole host of people and nations. In some cases, we were straight forward-no deception, just straight poor behavior. In other cases, there WAS deception that preceded this poor behavior.
I have always acknowledged that our government’s treatment of native populations, nations and people was unacceptable. However, I have always been leery at any attempt to make up for this all these years later through reparations or special benefits.
The Town of Pilot Mountain is home to Pilot Mountain State Park, which is a remnant of the ancient Sauratown Mountains. The Saura Indians who inhabited the area knew Pilot Mountain as Jomeokee, the “Pilot” or “Great Guide”. The Cherokee Indians eventually drove the Saura Indians out of the area. Pilot Mountain became the 14th State Park in 1968 when it was purchased from Mrs. J.W. Beasley. Pilot Mountain State Park is made up of 3,703 acres of land, which preserves the natural resources of North Carolina.
So, if the United States government is expected to compensate the Cherokee, would the Cherokee than be expected to compensate the Saura?
My guess is probably not. And why this is stumps me. I’m sure it has to do with some form of “ism” or intolerance inherent in me; being conservative and all.
On Tuesday federal officials said that there had been at least 19 previous outbreaks involving more than 1,000 illnesses and three deaths resulting from cantaloupe consumption since 1984. The current outbreak, caused by cantaloupes grown in Colorado, has sickened more than 70 people and killed at least 13, making it the deadliest food-borne outbreak in the United States in more than a decade.
“I don’t think the cantaloupe industry can continue on doing the very same thing and expecting a different result,” said Craig Wilson, the head of food safety for Costco, the Seattle-based warehouse retailer, which is regarded as a leader in requiring food safety measures from its suppliers.
Why would a private company do this?
It turns out that a company is more profitable when its products don’t kill its customers.
Social Security is structured from the point of view of the recipients as if it were an ordinary retirement plan: what you get out depends on what you put in. So it does not look like a redistributionist scheme. In practice it has turned out to be strongly redistributionist, but only because of its Ponzi game aspect, in which each generation takes more out than it put in. Well, the Ponzi game will soon be over, thanks to changing demographics, so that the typical recipient henceforth will get only about as much as he or she put in (and today’s young may well get less than they put in).
I’ll give you a clue. His name starts with Paul and ends with Krugman.
Bank of America, the nation’s biggest bank, said on Thursday that it planned to start charging customers a $5 monthly fee when they used their debit cards for purchases. It was just one of several new charges expected to hit consumers as new regulations crimp banks’ profits.
Wells Fargo and Chase are testing $3 monthly debit card fees. Regions Financial, based in Birmingham, Ala., plans to start charging a $4 fee next month, while SunTrust, another regional powerhouse, is charging a $5 fee.
And why are banks now looking to charge their customers who use their cards to access their money?
The round of new charges stems from a rule, which takes effect on Saturday, that limits the fees that banks can levy on merchants every time a consumer uses a debit card to make a purchase. The rule, known as the Durbin amendment, after its sponsor Senator Richard J. Durbin, is a crucial part of the Dodd-Frank financial overhaul law.
With the continuing debate surrounding our debt and our deficit, much ado has been made about taxes. Who should pay ’em and who shouldn’t. Embedded in that debate is the question of class warfare.
For a long time, a very VERY long time, the idea of class warfare has been one of the rich taking advantage of the non-rich for the rich’s personal gain. These days, you have the opposite phenomenon. You have people in America that feel there is a class war being waged, but not by the rich on the poor, but by the Left on the rich.
“If you say that we should not educate children who have come into our state for on other reason that they have been brought there by no fault of their own, I don’t think you have a heart,” Perry said.
Did’ja see that? Governor Perry wants us to govern based on “heart”. As in, if you don’t love puppies, you don’t have a heart. As in, if you don’t think that the government is entitled to steal your property because poor people don’t have health insurance, you don’t have a heart. As in, if you don’t think that the rich need to pay more in taxes while some people do without food iPhones, you don’t have a heart.
The capital “O” Oughts of government have nothing to do with “heart”. They have to do with a concept called Liberty.
The sooner we bring this lesson home the sooner our country gets back on the right track.
Okay, if we wander back to the tax levels just before Dubya lowered ’em, what would it look like?
Well, we can go look…
But Not Over
Not a bad rate, right? Taxes seem reasonable and we all enjoy our money.
But look what Dubya did:
But Not Over
He lowered the rate. By how much?
For the very poor among us, he lowered the rate by 33%.
For the very very rich among us, he lowered it by 33%. Wait. No?
Oh, he lowered it by 10%
And for just the very rich? Yeah, 7%.
So, now, some of us wanna go back to the good ‘ol days when tax rates were at the levels before Dubya came around. But……we ONLY wanna raise those rates for the very very rich. We don’t wanna raise rates for the very very poor.
I would suggest this. If you wanna raise the rates on the rich from 35% to 39.1%, which is a 12% increase, you should be willing to raise the lowest tax rates from 10% to 11.2%, also a 12% raise.
If you can’t do that, then you are asking one group of people to bear the burden while allowing another group of people to reap the benefits. THAT is class warfare.
If you wanna raise taxes, then fine, raise taxes, but raise ’em.
Speaking of merit pay. Is this what we are REALLY saying?
A group of highly experienced and highly educated individuals who make a living building methods that measure proficiency of highly subjective topics in populations made up of disparate individuals are unable to to build methods that measure the proficiency of highly subjective topics of a group of which THEY are a member of.
In other words, teachers are absolutely comfortable with the concept merit pay in the form of grades of their students but somehow object to that same line of thinking to their own performance?