Tag Archives: Wake County

Barely Legal

I was thinking about this last night as I was posting on the “Night is Day” thing:

All eight initiatives were the result of a series of private meetings in the past month between the four new members and the new board chairman, Ron Margiotta. Those meetings also included members of private groups that Margiotta declined to identify. Members of the new majority defended their private meetings, saying they didn’t violate state mandates because they had yet to be sworn in.

Look, I get it.  The old Board did things, and in ways, that some people didn’t like.  Because of that, the election process removed them from their seats and gave new people with new voices the ability to shape things.  That’s ho it’s supposed to work.  I’m very happy that it did work.

But these shenanigans are really really over the top:

Malone said they met before Tuesday because heading into the meeting unprepared would have sent their supporters a bad message.

“It’s not illegal,” Malone said. “We needed to be prepared. I had nightmares about walking into the meeting not being prepared.”

It’ll be fun to continue to watch this.  Fun to see if anything really changes.

Where Red is Blue and Blue is Red

I have been following the WCPSS drama for nearly three years now.  Besides the pure raw emotion poured into this debate, the shocking role reversal has been astounding.  Now, you would be hard pressed to find anything more local than a school board; perhaps a Home Owners Association or maybe a PTA board, but really, for all intents and purposes, the local school board is as close to the people as government is going to get.  And with that in mind, the folks involved, on both sides, really do try and give the appearance that they are not affiliated with any major political party.

But they are; they all are.

The support and the money breaks too neatly down party lines for it to be ignored.

All of which gives me a moment’s pause.  You see, when it really comes down to it, we have conservatives acting like liberals and liberals acting like conservatives.   And I say that from a conservative view-point.  See, normally, we on the right are acting from a standpoint of Liberty and freedom.  But here, the Republicans are acting like they can ignore such things.  For example, given two quotes, tell me which is the conservative and which is the liberal:

Politician One:  “We have to do something and move forward,” Politician One said. “Parents have a right to decide if they want a year-round school.”

Politician Two:  “If we’re talking about doing away with year-round schools, we’ll have to raise taxes,”

See what I mean?  You can’t tell.  You can’t tell because you know what the answer SHOULD be, but because I have been ranting you feel suspicious.  In this topsy tervyy world that is WCPSS, you have conservatives claiming they have a “Right” to select the location of their public education and you have a liberal resisting a tax increase.  Amazing.

Politics: Always the Same

The new members of the Wake County school board were sworn in last night.  Immediately changes began to take place.  And yet for all the change that was occurring, sadly, it all remained very much the same.

Before a packed, mostly hostile audience, the new group made ad hoc additions of major items to the agenda. That drew heated public comment from those opposed to the newcomers’ actions, a shocked reaction from members who now make up the board minority and a walkout by a group representing Wake teachers.

I feel like I’ve been punched in the mouth,” said Keith Sutton, a member representing East Raleigh.

Nothing to See Here; Move on

This time, instead of the families supporting neighborhood schools feeling left out, it’s the families supporting the diversity policy that are feeling left out.  Nothing, really, has changed; only that the other team has the ball and is driving.

One of the complaints against the old board was the fact that they often wouldn’t reach out to the public on policy issues:

The board quickly took up the district’s diversity policy, which uses busing to ensure balanced populations at each school. Once based on race, those calculations have relied on the poverty of students’ families since 2000.

However, no copies of the proposal on changing the diversity policy were given to members of the public before they were voted on. Instead, an overhead projector showed a copy with the phrase “creating and maintaining a diverse student body” with a line through it. The move to change the policy was sent to committee.

Apparently the information was not only withheld from the public, but from some of the board members as well:

“I like to study the things that I am going to vote on, but this is an unusual evening,” said member Anne McLaurin, a member of the board’s new minority. “I find this an interesting proposal, but I don’t feel prepared to vote on it without further information.”

Said ousted chair Kevin Hill about the last-minute resolutions: “To me this is a process that is very new to the school board, where essentially half the members are not privy to information prior to the meeting.”

And the battle between board and public is still very much of a “We vs. They” kind of thing; complete with threats:

“Please be quiet or we’re going to ask you to leave,” Margiotta told the audience. “Don’t make an arena out of us.”

When Margiotta’s remarks drew laughs, he threatened to ask security to make the crowd leave.

Look, there are a LOT of things that a school board can impact and I really am hopeful that this new board can make improvements.  Obviously, when it comes to strategies I am in favor of anything that encourages strong fiscal restraint.  I support any attempt to weaken organized teacher unions or representation organizations.  I like merit based pay for teachers.  But to be honest, the overwhelming issue that faces this board has been the combination of the Diversity Policy and the Year Round schooling; both of which I am in favor of.

Clearly something new occurred at last night’s meeting.  But just as clearly, nothing changed.

The Law of Supply and Demand is Proven Again!

If we ever had any doubt, there is a new real world example of the law of supply and demand:

Raleigh, N.C. — Home sales in the Triangle area shot up 44 percent in October from a year ago, but the good news was offset by a 12 percent decline in sale prices.

As prices decrease, demand increases.  Very soon, if left to its natural devices, the housing market will be dangerously close to equilibrium.

Oh, yeah.  About that pesky decline in sale prices?  Yeah, 2000+ families have now found buying a home affordable.

New and existing property sales hit 2,009 in October, up from 1,397 a year ago, according to the North Carolina Association of Realtors.

Go capitalism!

Tap'ing Out

Wanna know why public education can’t keep up with private industry?  One word.

Unions.

It’s the teacher unions in this country that have the educational process in a strangle hold.  These organizations restrict innovation, creativity and mobility.  It becomes virtually impossible to implement any sort of meaningful change as a result.  All of which gives me great joy to see this happening in Wake County:

Wilburn Elementary is the only Wake school that offers merit pay, in which some teachers could get bonuses while others get none based on how their students and the school perform.

Finally a system that incents people act in a manner that closer resembles the goal of the organization.  We want teachers to teach better.  Therefore, we should, as closely as possible, offer more money to teachers who teach better; not just longer.

As excited as I am over the policy, I am very concerned with how the new Board of Ed is couching it; and why we need it:

“Under community-based schools, we may have more schools with higher needs,” said Debra Goldman, a newly elected school board member. “We need to figure out how we can get more resources to those schools. TAP is a way we can do that.”
It would seem that the Board is more concerned with providing cover for the sure to come “high poverty schools” than with the actual program itself.
Right idea.  Wrong reason.

Pay to Play

When the government is in control, normal incentives go out the window.  The signal to get better is gone.  The signal to get cheaper is gone.  The signal to innovate is gone.  What’s left is a stagnant paradigm and an unending battle to improve on the obsolete.  But every once in a while, something like this comes along:

A $20 donation to Rosewood Middle School would have gotten a student 20 test points – 10 extra points on two tests of the student’s choosing. That could raise a B to an A, or a failing grade to a D.

If we can’t teach ’em to learn, teach ’em to buy!

The New WCPSS

I waited to post on this until after the election yesterday.  It comes as no surprise that John Tedesco won the run-off in Wake County’s district 2.  There were 3 candidates, John won 49.99% of the vote in October.  Because he failed to get the required 50.01%, a run-off was required.  However, his opponent withdrew leaving John an easy path to victory.

So it’s official.  Control of the board has moved from those who favor diversity to those who favor neighborhood schools.  Time will tell on the ability of the board to turn this ocean liner quickly, but I am sure that the look and feel of the district is going to change at least some and maybe significant.

Anyway, with that said, there was an interesting piece the other day in the News and Observer regarding diversity in the county.

I wasn’t part of the movement 30 years ago; shoot, I was 11.  But the thinking was that to help the black community, you had to bus some of the minority students out and move some of the white kids in; busing.  From a macro-economics standpoint, I can see the reasoning.  However, the white families didn’t wanna bus their kids.  And, ironically, neither did the black families.  This unique and almost unanimous disapproval caused much dissent among the families impacted.  However, Wake was able to continue this practice until a ruling made it illegal to assign students based on race.

Time for a new plan.  Going back to the drawing board, the district saw that race trended along socioeconomic lines.  And because the previous ruling didn’t limit busing based on income, a new day dawned.  Now, here is where I am a bit cloudy.  I am not sure of the thinkers in the district understood what they found.  I’m not sure if they were still trying to assign based on race and simply found a loophole or if they really were trying to identify at risk students.  Data shows that when normalized for income and other risk factors, black kids achieve at the same levels as do white kids.  Which is, of course, no surprise.

But the real kicker is that achievement trends strongly with income.  And low-income kids come from very high at risk families.  What the district should have done was announced that race based busing was not the secret sauce after all.  Rather, it was at risk busing that they really were after.  And income is a very large indicator of academic achievement.

Back to our news article.

An analysis of school system data by The News & Observer shows that many of the county’s neighborhoods, especially in suburban areas, have become relatively racially diverse. Available statistics indicate that less than 20 percent of Wake neighborhoods are more than 75 percent minority, and slightly more than a third appear to be 75 percent or higher white. Census data from 2000 showed a similar situation, spurred by growth and the entry of minorities into the middle class over the past few decades.

This seems like good news.  In Wake County, at least, we have a population that has mixed together well.  And from a pure social perspective, I think that’s a tribute to our community.  Not only that, but the mix of ideas and cultures only serves to make us a better and stronger community.

But when we look through the lens of income, the view is drastically different.

But The N&O’s analysis also shows a county split by income into halves. If all children went to their neighborhood schools, poor students would cluster in the county’s eastern half while students from more affluent families would be concentrated in Wake’s western side.

The N&O analysis, using neighborhood-level demographic data collected by the school system, shows that in the vast majority of northern and western Wake neighborhoods, fewer than 20 percent of students receive free and reduced-price lunches. On the other side of the line, in eastern and much of southern Wake, all but a handful of neighborhoods have more than 20 percent economically disadvantaged students.

And this is where a change in assignments has to occur very carefully.  I don’t think that any of the pro-diversity crowd feels that we need racially diverse classrooms to help people learn, I think they feel that we need economically diverse classrooms to help people learn.  And just like it did 30 years ago, I am afraid that fact will get overlooked in the analysis.

The challenge for the board is not small.  The market divides people very well, and I am a proponent of that market.

In Wake County, the strongest divider may be the price of real estate. For all their racial diversity, neighborhoods such as Cary’s Park Village has only students whose family can afford a home valued at $200,000 or more.

You simply are not going to have a  lot of poor kids going to these high dollar neighborhood schools.  Maybe that’s why parents moved to those neighborhoods to begin with; because the school is strong and well supported.  Probably.  I know that when we oved into our house that was a concern.

So we’ll see.  I’m not scared so much that we are changing.  The current system has its flaws.  What I am concerned about is that the underlying logic behind the changes won’t have changed much in 30 years.

Changing of the Guard

Well, for better or for worse, it happened.  The folks in Wake County who have opposed the Diversity Plan won.  And they won big.  I can only imagine that this means they are going to try and break down the work that has been done to ensure that schools maintain a balance of economically challenged families and non-economically challenged folks.

I have been torn in the days leading up to this election.  I am almost totally Libertarian.  Therefore I mostly disagree with the folks on the left when it comes to the economy and those on the right when it comes to things related to the social issues.  Schools always get me.  Every time.  And so it was this time as well, though even harder.

See, the left always wants to throw more money at the problem and protect the teachers in a Union kinda way.  And that NEVER works.  Ever.  You always get the lowest common denominator and the “enterprise” suffers.  But jeez, this Diversity thing has legs.  I really think it makes better schools.  The kids are better off and they learn more and we just don’t end up failing as many kids as we otherwise would.  So I sided with the Dems on this one.  Not because I think more money is the answer; or teachers unions [I hate ’em], but because the diversity strategy is an awesome tool in the toolbox.

Teacher’s Unions

I know that we don’t have teacher’s unions in Carolina, but still, the negative effects are everywhere.

Today, the N&O reported on the idea of merit pay for teachers.  In this case, the merit pay seemed to be limited to the type of school a teacher taught at; not how well that teacher did.  But still,  it’s a start.

I started my working career as a teacher, it was the first job I had after college.  Further, that first year was also a “negotiation” year for the “EA” and the school.  I remember the feeling when I saw the results of my elected representation:

No raises for teachers going from 0-1, 1-2 or 2-3 years of experience.  However, raises for everyone else.

I knew then that the whole “working for a union thang” wasn’t for me.  I left as soon as the year was up.

What I don’t understand is how so many people, with a straight face, claim that paying more money to a better performer is bad. Ffor anything.  Really.  Never ever understood that.  Ya know, while I think that the salaries we pay athletes is gross, at least we have the right incentives in place.

  1. We agree on a specific number of years in the contract.
  2. I will pay you according to the market.
  3. When you are no longer able to perform, you are no longer able to be employed.

Why would it be any different for teachers?  Why, WHY, do we want to protect low performing teachers?

I just don’t get it.

Wake County Schools

So, North Carolina has two very large school districts.  The way it works in Carolina, see, is that our schools districts are made up along the county lines; not by the cities.  This forces allows districts to be very very large.  For example, Raleigh is about the 48th largest city in the nation, and yet Wake County Public School  [WCPSS] is one of the top 10 in terms of student population.

The other thing that makes WCPSS unique is that it is one of the nation’s leading districts in how it is handling it’s student assignment.  Unlike many, if not most, districts across the country, WCPSS assigns students by financial status.  In this case, the district is using F&R [free and reduced lunches] as a proxy for income.  As a result, the policy that has been in place for a number of years is that the district planners are trying to keep all schools at no more than 40% F&R population.

The idea, according to district officials, is that as the ratio of low income students at a specific school increases, achievement decreases;for all students.   Therefore,  assignment by income, taccdording to the theory, increases achievement for all students as well as minimizing the chance that a school degenerates into an inner city horror show so prevalent among many of the nation’s districts.

Anyway, I was reading this weekend.  One story chronicled the difference in the assignment approach in Raleigh and Charlotte.  The other describes one local Charlotte school that has changed dramatically since that district abandoned busing in favor of local or neighborhood schools.

I am a big believer in education.  I firmly believe that the higher the education of the individual, the higher the income, the lower rate of incarceration and in general, the higher return to society.  Further, I am a strong supporter of public education.  While I typically am not in favor of entitlement programs, I find that educating our youth is not only helping them, but, from a national perspective, investing in ourselves.  Unlike perpetual welfare or the minimum wage, I find that our society is actually improved by providing public education to all children.

However, in time, I do come back to my data driven roots.  And in this case, I am finding that the studies showing the increase achievement not only to be sound, but compelling.  I do not claim that a poor child sitting next to a rich child will help both of them learn.  But what I am saying is this.  Schools in affluent neighborhoods are going to have parents that are involved in the school.  They are going to volunteer.  They are going to donate to the PTA.  They are going to make sure that the computer lab has, you know, computers.  Further, these parents are not going to accept that when there is violence in the halls, nothing be done.  They will demand action, and, because they have a demonstrable successful trajectory in life, they will get that action.  In short, the schools will be safer, cleaner and better equipped.  The exact thing, by the way, that will bring in the best teachers, or at least not have them running for the doors.

Folks on the other side, well, they see it another way.  They claim that busing takes away from the neighborhood feel.  They claim that busing takes away time for a child to study.  They claim that they moved into a certain neighborhood to go to a certain school.  In some ways, I empathize.  In most, I don’t.  My take, is that when data and studies show that a particular method works, and integration of economic societies helps, you go with the data.  Every time.

Just look again at that Charlotte school.  Its only been 7-8 years and the schools has fell back to old times and ways.  Sure the Charlotte district will say that they are keeping up with Wake, but, I don’t think they are.  The schools themselves certainly are not.  And, as older sentimental teachers retire or just give up, the scores will show it too….