Thelma And Louise

I’m guessing we go over.

John Boehner has said that he’ll give House members 48 hours to get back to Washington.  That means if he were to call them right now they wouldn’t get to their offices until Saturday.  Which leaves 2 days to pass legislation.

And that’s if he agrees to pass the Senate version of the bill.

As it stands right now, I think that the problem is this:

  • The President will not budge on his demand that the tax rate on wealthy Americans goes up.  That is a deal breaker for him.
  • The democrats will not agree to spending cuts other than defense.
  • The republicans will not raise the tax rate on anyone.

The fiscal cliff is made up of two parts.  The first is the expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts.  Because these rates were pushed through using reconciliation, they were set to expire in 2011.  However, as part of a negotiation, the rates were extended for 1 year.  This agreement will end December 31st at midnight.  Failure to extend the Bush tax rates will result in a massive tax hike for every American.

The second part is the agreement made that will mandate budgetary cuts; spending cuts.  Among the items set to be cut is the defense budget.  This is seen to be unappealing to republicans.

A guilty pleasure of mine would be to see us go over this cliff in full.  I want to see how American’s react to the tax hike that will impact them January 1.  This would include the extraordinarily large impact of the AMT that would impact millions of Americans.

However, my sick sense of cosmic justice aside, I really am looking for a permanent extension to the Bush tax cuts.  It not only is the right thing to do, but trying to raise the rates like Obama has been insisting is only a political ploy not meant to address any of the fiscal issues that we have right now.  With the rates made permanent, the economy will be able to remove the uncertainty and move forward in recovery.

As for the cuts.  I say let ’em come.  The impact will be short-term dramatic.  I suspect the economy will move into recession but it will be quick and short.  However, the long term benefit of the cuts will reduce the size of government spending and allow the economy to grow more quickly than it otherwise might.

My desire aside I feel that the ball is in the Senate’s court.  Financial bills originate in the House and move to the Senate for consideration.  The Senate should pass the bill or amend it and return it to the House.  Under Boenher, the House has passed two such bills that are simply waiting to be considered by Harry Reid.  For whatever reason, Reid will not hear those bills and allow the Senate to act.

Right now, the delay in passing a bill is squarely on Harry Reid and the democrats.

4 responses to “Thelma And Louise

  1. Tax cuts would help to stimulate the economy. but those tax cuts are funded with money that the government does not have. Let’s attack this country’s budget problem by cutting spending and also reducing tax breaks.

    Every dollar that our government cuts taxes today is one dollar plus interest that is added to our kids’ tax bills in the future.

    • Tax cuts would help to stimulate the economy.

      In a similar manner, tax hikes would hurt the economy.

      but those tax cuts are funded with money that the government does not have.

      So, the money first belongs to the people who earned it, not the government. Saying that tax cuts are funded by the government implies that the money first belongs to the government.

      With that said, today’s version of tax cuts being handed out in the form of actual checks to people DOES use government money. And I would agree that we should quit handing out that money.

      Let’s attack this country’s budget problem by cutting spending and also reducing tax breaks.

      If the spending cuts were big enough I would compromise on tax hikes.

  2. Thelma and Louise was a GREAT movie!

    Politically Obama has to raise taxes on the wealthiest. He must, he’ll lose his party if he doesn’t, especially since the politics of this issue is playing in favor of the Democrats. The wealthy aren’t hurt by the budget cuts, and they’ve done very well in a boom driven in part of debt and deficits. After all, it’s only on the money earned over $250,000 (or $500,000 if they compromise there). The taxes on the wealthy remain the same under Obama’s plan for all income up to $250,000.

    • Politically Obama has to raise taxes on the wealthiest. He must, he’ll lose his party if he doesn’t,

      I agree. Obama isn’t negotiating out of “good of the economy”, he’s negotiating out of politics. There is no good reason to raise taxes on the rich other than the campaign promise.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *