Education Reform In America: A Critique I Resonate With

While I don’t think that I’m alone in  my call that America’s educational system is in trouble I do find myself in the minority when it comes to ideas for possible reform.  Included in my list of ideas are:

  1. Reducing the power of teacher’s unions.
  2. Merit pay -merit pay is paying the good teachers more, not offering bonuses for targets-.
  3. Firing poor performing teachers.
  4. Continuing the public funding of education but allow the money to follow the backpack; public or private.

I’d imagine that for those that know me, this list isn’t shocking.  It might be cringe worthy, but not out of line for how I think.  For those that don’t know me, the list reads like the regular right-wing scree seen everywhere.

Whatever you think of the list, in favor or against, that list isn’t the point.  The point is that the traditional view of America’s performance is being taken to task  by Diane Ravitch in her recent CNN article:

It’s time to set the record straight. The only valid measure of academic performance in our schools is the federal test called the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). NAEP has been testing American students since the early 1970s.

This is something I didn’t know.  I have always thought that tests like the SAT, ACTs and the Iowa Standard were legitimate tests.  But whatever, I won’t quibble on the testing.

The NAEP test scores of American students are at their highest point in history: for black students, white students, Hispanic students, and Asian students.

They are at their highest point in history in fourth grade and in eighth grade, in reading and math.

 

To be sure, encouraging news.  Further, news I must admit I didn’t know.

As for the international test scores, which Rhee loves to recite to knock our public schools, she is obviously unaware that our nation has never had high scores on those tests. When the first international test was given in 1964, our students ranked 11th out of 12 nations.  Yet our nation went on to become the most powerful economy in the world.

In the 50 years since then, we have regularly scored in the bottom quartile on the international tests or at best, at the international average. Clearly, the international scores do not predict our future as we are the dominant economy in the world despite the scores.

I can’t resist to mention that things like economic freedom contribute to such things….

Why are our international rankings low? Our test scores are dragged down by poverty.   As the poverty level in the school rises, the scores fall.

Rhee ignores the one statistic where the United States is number one. We have the highest child poverty rate of any advanced nation in the world. Nearly 25% of our children live in poverty.

THAT is the point of this post.

THAT is an argument that I resonate with.  Of course, when comparing scores across nations, it’s important to normalize in some way across the variable that impact performance.  And to Ms. Ravitch, poverty is just such a variable.

Watch:

On the latest international test, called PISA, our schools with low poverty had scores higher than those of Japan, Finland, and other high-scoring nations. American schools in which as many as 25% of the students are poor had scores equivalent to the top-scoring nations.

When normalized on poverty, the United States performs among the top in the world.

Should this be surprising?  For me, it is.  But then again I’ve bought into the narrative that we suck.  So, taking our performance in new light…maybe it isn’t surprising.

One thing, however, I wonder if Diane Ravitch would be willing to slice the data in equivalent ways when it comes to healthcare?

Somehow I doubt it.

 

2 responses to “Education Reform In America: A Critique I Resonate With

  1. I am heartened that you seem to be open-minded enough to take Diane Ravitch’s information to heart. I don’t know if you realize it or not, but she was an Assistant Secretary of Education under President George H. W. Bush and used to support these concepts, until she saw the harm they were doing to children and schools. She is an educational historian and is much more knowledgable than Michelle Rhee, whose policies in Washington, D.C. were/have been miserable failures.

    Ms. Rhee’s main goal is to make money through the privatization of public schools. To make money, corners are cut, so my fear is that this would lead to our kids ending up getting a lesser education in the end. By the way, charter schools now do no better than public schools, so “Where’s the beef?”

    As adults, it seems logical to us that these reforms would work, but we should not force these concepts on the development of children. We seem to have forgotten the stages of development children go through and have tried to push the envelope, so to say, by introducing concepts at earlier times, when children are not ready to learn them. We need to back off because we are more likely to end up with a whole lot of screwed-up individuals rather than better-educated ones.

    Unions protect a worker’s right to due process – the same right we would/should have in a courtroon. Reformers take isolated cases and generalize them to the entire teacher workforce. There is no teachers’ union that would want a bad teacher to stay in the classroom. The fact is that innocent people get accused of bad things, and they have the right to due process. With no unions, teachers/workers could be fired for personal, political, or age reasons.

    I am not sure why you refer to health care at the end as it has nothing to do with the rest of your article; that is a whole other issue.

    • I am heartened that you seem to be open-minded enough to take Diane Ravitch’s information to heart.

      Sure thing! We all have to remain open minded about these subjects.

      I don’t know if you realize it or not, but she was an Assistant Secretary of Education under President George H. W. Bush

      I did.

      Ms. Rhee’s main goal is to make money through the privatization of public schools.

      I have admit that I’ve never heard this. I cannot imagine that she is trying to make money; I would suggest that she is trying to improve education.

      We seem to have forgotten the stages of development children go through and have tried to push the envelope, so to say, by introducing concepts at earlier times, when children are not ready to learn them. We need to back off because we are more likely to end up with a whole lot of screwed-up individuals rather than better-educated ones.

      To be sure, any reforms should take the natural development of the kids into the mix.

      Unions protect a worker’s right to due process – the same right we would/should have in a courtroon.

      This benefit is greatly overstated. I work in a very competitive work environment and I never see people let go for those three reasons you have listed. Rather, I see managers enticing the best and brightest to remain on their “team” by giving raises, bonuses and flexible schedules.

      I am not sure why you refer to health care at the end as it has nothing to do with the rest of your article; that is a whole other issue.

      I have a long history making the exact same argument Diane uses in my defense of the Unites States health care is all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *