I’ve seen this going around my Facebook. Thought I’d repost:
Let’s get one thing clear.
I care for the people less fortunate.
The government has no role in that caring.
Okay, that’s two, but the second is important. The government has a role. And that role is to act as the referee in disputes. It is to make sure that we all face the same rules and laws. Sure, there is a cost in maintaining a government, so we tax to pay for it. But that role of government is not meant to take money from those who have it and just flat out GIVE it to those who don’t.
When that role is given to the government, bad things happen. Really bad things.
It creates incentives that aren’t natural. People begin to look for ways to avoid paying their taxes and people begin to look for ways to maximize their TAKE of people’s taxes. Neither system works well.
When people slide around money to avoid taxes, the revenues realized aren’t as high as expected, so taxes are raised. While generating the income, it increases the incentive to defraud the government. This further punishes the honest man at the benefit of the crook. Further, taxes relieve a man of his property. What the government takes is first private property.
People forget this.
The money being taken first belonged to someone who earned it. Confiscation of that property should be done with significant reluctance.
Most importantly, by taking one man’s property and giving it to another, the second man is less incented to earn his own. Life becomes simply a series of cons and loopholes meant to get through today. We lose the productivity of the second man and the power of the money had it been spent in more productive ways.
We lose on both sides.
Some highlights:
0:08 Do you need a tissue?
0:26 – You can’t find no job they give you money to live on.
0:44 – The furrowed brow. This will be a hilarious recurring theme.
1:12 – I spent it on myself.
1:35 – The you’re stealing that money. BOOM!
1:36 – No! See tissue above.
2:32 – $22,000! Per year!
3:15 – My conversation is rent…
3:24 – I’m 21.
4:24 – I’m me!
4:30 – That’s what were creating.
4:49 – Sending this tape to Congress.
5:00 – As taxpayers, we have spent at least $70,000.
5:10 – I appreciate that Judge Judy…Note he can’t keep a straight face.
5:45 – $70,000 right down the sewer.
I’m not sure if the end makes me laugh or cry. She was actually suing him for rent.
I often remark on the powerful effect of incentives. Lately it’s been with creating an incentive to cross a busy freeway. My point being that the government can cause perverse incentives.
In the past I’ve mentioned that unemployment benefits create the same condition. By the nature of paying someone not to work, you create an incentive NOT to work. At lest on some level. Further, if the benefit is large enough, the individual is going to create an internal value proposition and will only return to work when that value proposition reaches an inflection point that benefits him. In other words, no one is going to work for 40 hours for $320 when he can not work for 40 hours and make $335.
Last year the demand for our construction services, to our delight, was as they say “going through the roof” to a point where were turning down more work than we were accepting. Frustrated that we could not be available to the potential new clients that were calling on us, and simultaneously excited that this was happening to our company, since unemployment had broken the double digits marker. I decided we would grow, work to sign up as much as 40% more in total contracts, and hire up to 12 additional full time employees. Basically take advantage of our good fortune and get a small portion of our community back to work.
The plan was initiated, the additional contracts were signed up and then we set out to hire the employees. Little did I know that attempting to hire the employees needed, which I had thought to be the easiest part, would turn out to be a nightmare if not impossible. I’m sure that reading this you will be almost as surprised as I was directly experiencing it.
My experience: Before 2009 if our company advertised for an open position, on average we would get 20 to 30 applications, interview six to eight of the applicants, and hire one or two, based on the quality and potential of the candidates. This process has been deteriorating dramatically since 2009 and now at the end of 2011 it has completely hit bottom. Of all the applications that we have received this year, when asked why they were seeking a job with us, one out of three answered: my unemployment is running out and I have to go back to work. Earlier this year after I hired two new full-time employees, went through our company’s orientation process, fitted them with our work clothing and booked them to start within a week, they both quit. One called ahead of the start date to apologize but wanted to inform us he would not be coming in because the government had just extended unemployment benefits again. The second one just did not show on his first day and when I called him he said he couldn’t come in now because unemployment had been extended and he was making almost as much as we were planning to start him out with. If this is not frustrating enough to those of us that provide jobs and pay taxes let me give you my last two attempts this year. Both times we advertised in various media at great expense. The first time only seven applicants came in, I set up personal interviews with two for potential hiring, neither of them even showed up. The second time with six applicants, I set up interviews with four, one called in to cancel the interview, one did not even show up, two actually came in, though one was late. To summarize (in case you missed the math) of the last six people that I called for interviews for potential full-time employment only two came with one being late. It is more than frustrating, it’s perverted.
If we are going to insist on providing unemployment benefits, at least reform the process so that the individual has to report to an office, perform community service when waiting for responses and allow for better monitoring.
It creates incentives that aren’t natural. People begin to look for ways to avoid paying their taxes and people begin to look for ways to maximize their TAKE of people’s taxes. Neither system works well.