It’s a little old, but this story has been in my stack for a few days:
(MoneyWatch) It is late October, so Adrianne Flowers is out of money to buy food for her family. That is no surprise. Feeding five kids is expensive, and the roughly $600 in food stamps she gets from the federal government never lasts the whole month. “I’m barely making it,” said the 31-year-old Washington, D.C., resident and single mother.
When reading that story the more interesting question regarding social policy is not, “How do we feed this family?” Rather, the more interesting question is, “How do we prevent such family structures from forming?”
I’m a married father of two living in a two person income household. My wife and I are both professional managers in a Fortune 50 company. When someone in my peer group reports that they have 4 kids, much less 5, my reaction is always, “Really? FOUR kids? How do you do it?”
A recent post discussing the subsidies of Yale educated professionals has generated a LOT of emotional responses. However people feel about the fact that people receive benefits, no is disputing the fact that this couple is free to live the life they choose. I would submit that Ms. Flowers fits that same case. Namely, if you wanna have 5 kids feel free, however, if you find that you are unable to support those children, don’t look to society to support them for you.
No one is saying that Ms. Flowers isn’t at liberty to build her family as she sees fit. I’m just saying that I should have the same liberty as it applies to my property.