Benghazi Continues To Demand Attention

I’m preparing a post regarding the continued saga that is Benghazi.  However, before I do I think it’s important to point out a little analysis I did on a past post in the comments.

Scott mentioned that Obama referred to the attacks as “acts of terrorism” the next day.  I’ve read the transcript and listened to the remarks.  And I don’t remember ever thinking that Obama referred to the attacks in Benghazi as those “acts of terrorism.”  In fact, I was struck by how he AVOIDED that reference.  He does this here in the same way that he refuses to name terrorism instead referring to it as “man caused disasters.”  In the same way that he refers to the Ft. Hood shooting as “work place violence.

Obama does NOT want to label events as terrorist attacks.

So I went back to the transcript and looked for Obama specifically referencing the attacks on the consulate.  This is what I found:

He mentions the attacks directly in the statements I’m copying.

The first:

Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi.

The second:

The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack.

The third:

We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.

The fourth:

Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans.

The fifth:

And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

The sixth:

We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act.

The seventh:

But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in stark contrast to those of their attackers. These four Americans stood up for freedom and human dignity.

And that’s it – seven mentions of attacks and not one single reference to terror.

Now, to be sure, the left has some righteous ammunition on statements and context.  Take the republican’s attack on “You didn’t build that.”  Clearly Obama was referencing the infrastructure work he mentioned directly before that comment.  That didn’t stop the right, and me, from scorching him over those comments but at least I mentioned that the context supported Obama’s contention.  But here, the democrats are trying to pull the same shennanigans – they wana change the context.  And theyjust can’t do it.

3 responses to “Benghazi Continues To Demand Attention

  1. Oh, come on, CNN played the remarks: “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. ”

    The only way you can say he’s not calling it an act of terror is to say that he was suddenly talking about something else in his speech, even though it had all been about the Libya attacks. So you can talk about Libya. Mitt didn’t want to in the foreign policy debate after he got burned by it. The country is focused on Sandy. This isn’t a saga, it’s getting no media attention or campaign attention. It’s simply a non-issue.

    • Oh, come on, CNN played the remarks: “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

      Never disputed that; I only claim that they refer to 9/11/2001, not Libya.

      The evidence is too strong. Obama refuses to use the word terrorism. No way he calls it an act of terrorism here only to then go two full weeks of making it about a video.

      after he got burned by it.

      No one in the whole world thought Candy Crowley would enter the debate as a participant.

  2. This is why Obama can turn this into a strength. There is no way to counter this without getting into details of advisers saying things or sounding murky. This is why Romney didn’t push him on Libya – Obama turns it into a positive: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/ns/msnbc_tv-morning_joe/#49594656

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *