Look, it’s simple. We all do it. There are times in every good household when something unexpected comes up. Or, in times of over spending, perhaps it shouldn’t be unexpected, but, you get the point. You look in the checkbook and look at the bills and confirm that it isn’t going to add up. You are going to have to reduce spending or get another job. It happens to all of us. Happens to me. Will happen to me again. And this is healthy; it forces us to keep what is important to us and shed what isn’t.
For example, as I monitor my “play money” fund and see that it’s going to be bankrupt in 3 months I am forced to review what I am paying for in terms of “play”. I see that I have 3 magazine subscriptions and 5 on line subscriptions. Further, I am spending 90 bucks a month on aikido and so on and so on. Given that I have to shave off $50 a month, I go through what everybody goes through. I itemize my “play money” expenditures, rank them in order of value and cut the ones that are of LEAST VALUE! Notice I say value, not dollar expenditure. See, I really appreciate my aikido and am willing to keep that program intact even though it has a higher dollar value than say, Forbes. Sadly, Forbes is a redundant source and it gets wacked.
What I don’t do is this:
Democrats generally agree that tax increases are needed to avoid what they say would be devastating cuts to education and social services for children and the state’s poor.
See, to me, that’s disingenuous. Who DOESN’T want to avoid cutting these programs? There’s not a person in the world that wants to cut education and social services. First. It has to be at the top, or close to it, of every single politicians value list. Or should be. And that’s what makes me mad about Liberals. They want and take the easy way out every time.
- When forced to cut, they won’t.
- When asked to prioritize, they won’t.
- When required to do what all adults do-they balk.
Now, this doesn’t mean that Education won’t have to cut back some. It doesn’t mean that schools have a green light to spend spend spend. But what it does say is that there HAVE to be places where we can cut before we have to implement “devastating cuts to education and social services”.