Yesterday was May Day around the world – the one day when the world’s most social/commun-ist minded people celebrate the forms of government that renders the common man so much worse off than they otherwise would have been.
Consider two neighbors and their divergent paths:
While both Chile and Venezuela are democratic republics with mixed economies, Chile has a far greater level of market integration. HumanProgress.org’s ranking of economic freedom (based on the level of government intervention) lists Chile as the 10th freest economy in the world, leading South America. Venezuela, however, ranks last in the world.
Venezuela and its Chaveznistas have been so successful that the oil industry is in shambles, people are starving and even toilet paper is scarce.
Never to be ones to be satisfied with their poor reputation, these gentle souls of the people continue to make news:
A May Day march in Portland, Ore., “devolved into a full-scale riot with random acts of vandalism” by anarchists late Monday, police say. Attacks on police and emergency personnel resulted in 25 arrests.
Molotov cocktails, smoke bombs and other items were thrown at police, according to member station Oregon Public Broadcasting.
“Various fires were set in the street and in garbage cans, a police car was spray-painted and vandalized, and there were attempts to set at least one business on fire,” according to Portland Police. “Numerous projectiles were thrown at or launched at police and firefighters including rocks, bottles, ball bearings, fireworks, smoke bombs, and road flares.”
I leave you with The Sage:
Young man haulin’ the mail!
Derek Onserio, a senior at Providence Academy in Plymouth, was accepted to eight Ivy Laegue schools. Onserio has four siblings, two of which also attend Ivy League schools. He is the son of Kenyan immigrants.
You go boy!
In short – virtually none.
The budget proposal Trump delivered did call for a reduction in the money that eventually makes its way to Meals on Wheels.
Here is the impact in Wake County:
A spokesperson for the administration said federal dollars only account for about 3 percent of funding for Meals on Wheels.
“For every dollar in public funding that we get from the federal, state and county government, we do raise about $2,” said Alan Winstead with Wake Meals on Wheels.
I get the idea that a ‘compassionate society’ doesn’t neglect the most at risk and vulnerable. And I agree that a society Ought care for its own. However, the nobility earned by such a sentiment is lost when such care is obtained by force.
Much better this:
Winstead said even though the official impact of the budget cuts on Meals on Wheels is unclear, they are using the time to advocate and raise money for the program.
All of this doesn’t even mention the staggering fact that an organization can’t increase efficiency by 3%.
If I were in position to craft state law here in Raleigh, my response to the NCAA and their ban on NC* would be this:
Simply restrict restroom and locker room access in the exact same manner as the NCAA restricts access to sporting teams in their leagues:
The following policies clarify participation of transgender student-athletes undergoing hormonal treatment for gender transition:
1. A trans male (FTM) student-athlete who has received a medical exception for treatment with testosterone for diagnosed Gender Identity Disorder or gender dysphoria and/or Transsexualism, for purposes of NCAA competition may compete on a men’s team, but is no longer eligible to compete on a women’s team without changing that team status to a mixed team.
2. A trans female (MTF) student-athlete being treated with testosterone suppression medication for Gender Identity Disorder or gender dysphoria and/or Transsexualism, for the purposes of NCAA competition may continue to compete on a men’s team but may not compete on a women’s team without changing it to a mixed team status until completing one calendar year of testosterone suppression treatment.
Any transgender student-athlete who is not taking hormone treatment related to gender transition may participate in sex-separated sports activities in accordance with his or her assigned birth gender.
A trans male (FTM) student-athlete who is not taking testosterone related to gender transition may participate on a men’s or women’s team.
A trans female (MTF) transgender student-athlete who is not taking hormone treatments related to gender transition may not compete on a women’s team.
The NCAA itself discriminates based on gender. FURTHER, the organization differentiates between MTF and FTM.
Opposition to HB2 indeed.
Look, Trump is no shiny nickel. As they say, ‘Elect a clown. Expect a circus.”
But at least we don’t have to be subjected to boilerplate South American Dictator skreed. It’s a Netflix show – I get it. But I was struck by the fact that it could very well have been Obama on that stage.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – I do NOT doubt the nobility of the liberal. From food stamps to public schools – from Medicaid to minimum wage. The liberal is earnestly striving the raise the standard of living for the less fortunate.
They’re just wrong.
They are wrong due to two critical errors:
1. They don’t understand economics.
2. They assign the moral benefits of personal charity to voting for a larger state.
Take for instance the minimum wage.
Businesses run on margin – profit. Often that margin is razor thin. So, if wages equate to X% of your expenses and those wages are going to go up by 40% it only stands too reason that costs need to go up by 40% of X or some other expense is going to go down by 40% of X.
That ‘other’ expense? Wages. Either fewer wage earners or fewer hours worked.
And guess who is the first guy shafted? The least productive – often the least experienced, the youngest, the poorest and the most in need of a job.
The cold hard fact of the matter. If you want to increase the gap between my kids and kids born to a single, minority, uneducated, poor woman, you simply increase the minimum wage.
Not only do her kids not get the same jobs my kids get – they never benefit from the ‘On The Job Training’ that my kids get.
In the summer of 1995, more than half of teens age 16 to 19 worked in the summer; today, less than a third do. The drop has been especially steep for boys, who are now less likely than girls to work during the summer. Experts attribute the decline to a variety of forces: the disappearance of many entry-level jobs, the rising share of young people spending their summers in school or other educational activities and, at least recently, a rising minimum wage. (Employers may not see teen workers — especially those with less experience or fewer skills — as worth $10 or more per hour.)
Two of the three reasons are direct responses to increased cost of labor – automation and worth.
Young Americans from low-income families have been especially hard-hit by the decline in summer employment. According to data from the Current Population Survey, teenagers whose families make less than $20,000 per year are now less than half as likely to work as those from families who earn at least $100,000, and, unlike their wealthier peers, low-income teens have seen hardly any rebound in employment since the recession ended. (Black and Hispanic teens, too, have far lower employment rates than whites.)
Unfortunately, low-income teens are also the ones who most need summer jobs. They need the money, of course — a job that might provide pocket-money to a middle-class teen could be a key source of income for someone from a poorer family. But they also need the experience.
My son is soon going to hit the job market. And I’ll find him a job. I’ll either make one or or find one or buy one. I won’t do this so that he has money for more Pokemon cards or Xbox games. I’ll do this so that when he hits high school he’ll know how to:
The tragedy, the REAL tragedy, is that the minimum wage liberal is doing more damage to the population they hope to help than any capitalist ever could.
My biggest concern about Trump is that he mimics Obama and trounces the constitution, expands the scope of the Federal government and inches ever closer to a “too big to fail” executive.
My second biggest concern about Trump is the pendulum – the swing back to a liberal majority.
Perhaps I’m wrong in fear number two:
But what made the tea party successful, according to Theda Skocpol, a Harvard professor whose field studies of the tea party movement became a 2011 book, was a particular climate on the political right. “We thought of the tea party as a set of several intersecting forces that were leveraging each other and helping to build each other’s clout to change and use the Republican Party,” she said. Self-organizing grass-roots groups, top-down professional advocacy and money groups, such as FreedomWorks and Americans for Prosperity, along with right-wing media, swirled together to make the movement a success, according to Skocpol. It remains to be seen if the climate on the left will prove to be hospitable for the growth of a similarly effective movement.
Personally, my belief is that the Left is made up of fringe groups – each with their complaint. It might be the environment, or women’s rights, racism, the poor or refugees. Almost always the group is made up of people who themselves are not injured, but instead are people *representing* the injured.
Further, these groups don’t advocate policy that would require themselves OR the aggrieved to bear responsibility for the work to be done to fix the problem. THAT responsibility falls on someone else, usually the rich, the white or the man.
As such, because they don’t feel it their responsibility, combined with the fact that it is not them impacted, they will never dig deep enough to do the work.
I shouldn’t fear the professional ‘outrager’, but I admit to some lost sleep.
I’ve often wondered why it’s been accepted as fact that if the racial makeup of a police force doesn’t match the racial makeup of the citizenry, then something is wrong.
Now we have some data:
“What we find is evidence that [having] more black police officers probably doesn’t offer a direct solution to this problem,” Sean Nicholson-Crotty, a political scientist at Indiana University and one of the study’s authors, said. Indeed, the researchers concluded that as the ratio of black officers in police departments rose — up to a certain threshold — so did the number of fatal encounters between officers and black residents.
I have a theory. As an organization looks at itself and finds a demographic under represented and then seeks to increase that representation, they will lower the barrier to entry. Thus allowing less qualified individuals entrance into the group.
My brother lost his job last week. They moved the work to a contracting house staffed with laborers accepting lower wages. I think we need to seriously consider our immigration policy to limit foreign workers to our country.
They are stealing our jobs.
Consider the shop your brother was working in – the cabinet maker’s shop. Do you believe that the workers in that shop were offered more money to work down the street but turned that wage down to work there?
Why, Callidus, that would be madness! Why would a craftsman turn down a stronger wage only to work for less?
Exactly my point. A man is entitled to negotiate the terms of employment to the best of his ability and expertise.
Let me ask you, when the cabinet builder takes his lunch, is he obligated to pass the sandwich shop offering a higher quality meal to instead walk to the more expensive stand?
Of course not! A man would be a fool to buy the more expensive lunch of equal or lower quality. What does this have to do with my brother?
What, Hebes, should he not consider the character of the sandwich shop owner? What if the man’s brother had just lost his leg? Should that not play into his decision to buy the more expensive sandwich?
Callidus, what OF the man’s brother. If he requires charity, so let it be. But a man ought buy a sandwich without such concerns.
What if the foolish sandwich shop bought meat from a vendor who charged more – so he in turn could care for his mother?
Callidus, stop with this man’s brother, this man’s mother. If the shop keeper is foolish and purchases meat at too high a price, he should not expect me to make him whole in the price of the sandwich. If he is charitable, then he may enjoy his charity! But that he might force the burden on me? No way.
So you would agree that a man may negotiate terms of his wage?
And the terms of his purchase of goods?
And the nature of his charity? But not that of yours?
Most certainly yes!
Then why do you hate the furniture shop keeper?
Callidus! Why would you say such a thing?
Well, you tell me a man is free to negotiate his wage yet you deny the same liberty of the wage payer. In the next breath, you condemn the sandwich monger as foolish for paying too much for his commodities. Even then you blame him for high prices to support his brother. Or that man’s mother. Yet you praise the worker looking for a fairly priced meal.
Why do you hate the furniture maker for paying less for his workers? Certainly the wife of the sandwich man might enjoy less expensive cabinets?
Ahh Callidus, you are clever! I will console my brother, cook him a meal and help him find another job.
You have changed my mind. We should let every man of any country into our own! We might all enjoy less expensive meals with even less expensive cabinets!
Hebes, you do not listen to any of my words.