So the claim is that there’s a “war on religion” going on. And when you hear that you can safely substitute “religion” for “Christianity.” I’m not sure that war is the right word, but there is clearly an over-reach by the left when it comes to the separation of the church and the state.
We know what they meant when they crafted the nation. They meant that the “officers” of the church were not to be the “officers” of the state. The two couldn’t be the same. They most certainly, and clearly, did NOT mean that there was to be no religion in the state.
There’s a poem going through the innertubes. I’ve seen it a number of times on my Facebook feed and finally decided to watch and listen. I don’t enjoy the genre [never have enjoyed rap] and the lyrics are somewhat strained. But the message……yeah man, that’s some cool stuff:
So I did a quick search and found a response. Much less popular, but I enjoyed that message as well; perhaps more so. I acknowledge that if I were to bow my head in prayer before a meal with a Jew, a Muslim and a Hindi, my God would hear and acknowledge each of our supplications.
It’s a crazy thing, God. But if you have ever considered a conscience while feeling the wind on a cliff, or the sweet sound of a babies laughter, you’ve heard what I hear.
Pastors Terry Jones and Wayne Sapp are loathsome individuals to be sure. It’s one thing to hold a belief, to claim faith and ardently follow your heart and spirit through the religion you choose. But to purposely insult, demean and antagonize another set of beliefs is simply horrible.
Further, it’s inconsistent with the message of most mainline religions. As a Christian I practice patience, tolerance and love of my neighbors. Even my enemies. As such, even if, and I certainly don’t hold this belief, but even if those of another religion were my “enemy” I find consistency in the Lords commandment to “love thy enemy”.
To burn the most Holy Book of Islam is an insult that goes too far.
With that said, I am finding the inconsistency in response appalling.
I’m not sure what it means; I wanna stay away from the very thing I suspect it is.
I was reading though Renaissance Guy this morning when he brought up the very thing I’ve been rattling around:
…in the Fort Hood shooting there was a Muslim man who clearly considered himself part of the massive struggle that radical Muslims call jihad. In that case, however, the media darlings tried and tried to avoid reporting it.
in the Tucson shooting there allegedly and apparently is a lone man, deeply disturbed and incoherent, with no clearly dilineated political persuasion and no definite motive. It’s a bit too soon to tell for certain, but it appears that they [the media] were dead wrong again…
Let’s take a look.
I’m on a roll.
First it was the crack reporting out of the NY Times. Good stuff.
Then, yesterday we have Reuters joining in on the fun.
Today? Reuters is back at it.
So, I pointed out yesterday that reporters aren’t very good at reporting.
And then, just today, they’re back at it:
Reuters) – A Somali-born teenager was arrested on Friday for attempting to detonate what he thought was a car bomb at a Christmas Tree lighting ceremony in Oregon, officials said.
The whole article is 457 words.
Number of times the reporters referrenced his religion? Zero.
Number of times the word Muslim appeared? Zero.
Number of times the word Islam appeared? Zero.
The more and more I watch, follow this stuff and learn, I begin to feel that there is no party for me. I see these far far off the map religious kooks and I’m like “Jeez! That’s not even CLOSE to me!”