Look, I get it. Some of us are okay with military action in order to protect our interests. Others, not so much.
Some folks would like the US to lead in International affairs. Again, others would rather we took a more passive role and involve ourselves only insomuch as we are part of a larger coalition.
Be that as it may, we are seeing, and will continue to see, how a world reacts with America acting as a partner, not a leader.
As an aside, I am curious. Can anyone describe the substantial difference in Libya breaking one single UN resolution that makes force okay while Iraq breaking multiple UN resolutions did not justify force?